|
| |
NTCHS
Annual Meeting Minutes
January 29-30, 2003
Lincoln, Nebraska
Meeting Minutes
Members Present: Chris Noble (COE),
Herb Huddleston (Oregon State
University), Ed Blake (Nevada, NRCS),
Buck Reed (USFWS), Mike
Whited (WLI, NRCS),
Lenore Vasilas (Maryland, NRCS),
Chien-Lu Ping (University of Alaska), Richard Griffin
(Prairie View A&M University), Mike Vepraskas (North Carolina State University),
Jimmie Richardson (North Dakota State University), Bill Volk (BLM),
Wade Hurt (NSSC, NRCS),
and Chair, Karl Hipple (NSSC, NRCS).
Members Absent: Mike Lilly (NRCS),
Wayne Skaggs (North Carolina State University), Bill Sipple (EPA),
and Randy Davis (FS).
Resource Personnel Present: Full Time: Russ
Pringle (WLI, NRCS)
and Part Time: Carolyn Olsen (NSSC, NRCS).
Meeting was called to order by Hipple at 8:05 am Wednesday, January 29. After
introductions, Hipple distributed objectives of this meeting and minutes of the
previous meeting. Members read the minutes and made minor corrections. Motion
for approval of corrected minutes was made by Griffin and seconded by Volk.
Motion passed.
Hipple announced that the revised Hydric Soil Criteria were published in the
Federal Register on September 18, 2002, introduced Ed Blake as the replacement
for Neil Peterson (Washington, NRCS),
and announced that Sipple is to retire soon and
that EPA needs to name a replacement.
Reed moved that the essence of the fieldwork reviewed by the NTCHS
during its annual meeting be captured in the minutes. Richardson seconded the motion and
the motion passed.
Whited reported that test field indicator TF7 was being tested in the Chicago
area (MLRAs 95B, 108, or 110). Two transects with consensus hydric soil,
consensus nonhydric soil, and the TF7 (Drummer Series) soil will be instrumented
and duplicated. Piezometers, wells, thermocouples, and precipitation gages have
been installed. Platinum electrodes will be installed soon. Mark Bramstedt (Illinois,
NRCS), Robert Darmody
(University of Illinois), Bob McCleese (Illinois, NRCS), and
Whited are lead investigators. COE is the funding agency. Vasilas reported that
test field indicator TF2 was being tested in the Mid-Atlantic States. Whited
reported that New England States may start some testing soon.
Hurt reported on the Magnetic Susceptibility (MS) work he has been conducting
with Bill Zanner (University of Nebraska). The theory is that hydric soils
should have significantly lower magnetic susceptibility than nonhydric soil due
to the reduction of iron in hydric soils. This theory did not work in the Texas
Coast Prairies but worked well in the playas of Oregon. Failure and success of
MS technology maybe explained by a map produced by USGS that shows the iron
content throughout the U.S. at a depth of 20 cm. Preliminary work indicates MS
will work well in the purple areas and very poorly in the blue areas. Additional
testing is needed in the yellow areas. Action Item: Hurt to email
membership the map. Hurt reported that MS equipment from the only supplier of
whom he is aware is costly. Richardson reported that an additional supplier
might be Rinita Dalan (Minnesota State University Moorhead). Action Item:
Richardson to email membership the address of Rinita Dalan.
Hipple introduced the topics of Biological Zero and Growing Season by
referencing an email message from Joe Moore (Alaska, NRCS)
which requested NTCHS
define Biological Zero as "the temperature below which the growth and functions
of locally adapted plants and microorganisms are negligible." Ping presented
data (data enclosed) that indicate growing seasons in northern Alaska are not
accurately estimated by a soil temperature at 50 cm of 5 or more degrees C but
could be better estimated by soil temperature of 0 + 1 degree C.
Discussion concerning Biological Zero were tabled to allow Hipple to
introduce the topic National Hydric Soil List and to allow Jim Fortner (NSSC,
NRCS), as scheduled,
to discuss the present NASIS hydric soil list status.
Hipple stated that the only national list available was the 1995 list developed
from "frozen" legacy State Soil Survey Database (SSSD) data. Fortner stated that
two NASIS list alternatives are now available: 1) stored ratings from direct
input and 2) derived ratings derived from NASIS soils data. Motion by Griffin
that the National Hydric Soil List will be a composite of the various local Soil
Survey Hydric Soil Lists and will be based on derived ratings not stored
ratings. Vepraskas seconded the motion and the motion passed. Action Item: Hipple to write memo to State Soil Scientists
that the National Hydric Soil List will be a
composite of the various Local Soil Survey Hydric Soil Lists and will be based
on derived ratings not stored ratings.
Biological Zero discussion resumed. Motion by Richardson that Biological Zero
be defined as "the point that the temperature below which the growth and
functions of locally adapted plants and microorganisms are negligible.
Biological Zero is an effective condition to define the growing season
regionally." Following discussion the motion and second were withdrawn.
Motion by Richardson that Biological Zero is defined as "the soil temperature
at a depth of 50 cm below which the growth and function of locally adapted
plants and microorganisms are negligible." Motion by Blake to delete the words
"and microorganisms" from the motioned definition. Seconded by Richardson. The
motion to delete passed. Motion by Vepraskas to accept the amended definition.
Seconded by Richardson. Motion passed.
Noble reported that funds from COE for researching wet soils might be
available in the near future.
Hipple and Hurt led a discussion concerning status of test indicators. Other
than testing of TF7 and TF2 mentioned above Vasilas stated the Mid-Atlantic are
testing some chroma 3 soils. Action Item: Hipple will draft letter to
State Conservationists that states test indicators that have no testing
activities will be dropped in 2 years and that all future proposals for test
indicators must be written and contain an action plan describing test indicator,
project participants, data collection timelines and methods, and a final date
when the data will be submitted to the NTCHS.
Whited gave a report concerning the WLI
funded projects with PIs of Steve
Faulkner (formerly Louisiana State University and currently USGS) and Martin
Rabenhorst (University of Maryland). Volk mentioned the ongoing long-term
drought in the western U.S.
Reed provided the following (USFWS)
report on hydric soil issues (NTCHS
response is in bold following each of the issues). Reed's report contained
additional issues solicited from regional USFWS staff.
Reed
- Inability to provide a revised national list of hydric soils due to lack
of data populated in NASIS. Useful logic edit check comparing soil
classification versus hydrologic and interpretation data. Need for revised
hydric soil criteria in NASIS to produce a more accurate national list of hydric
soils.
- Concern for how hydric soils are interpreted and displayed nationally now
that each soil series is assessed separately by each state. Need to review edge
faults and patchwork quilt distributions.
- Need for assessment of relative occurrence of wetland on each hydric soil.
A good first step would be to identify all soils that always support wetland
under natural conditions.
- Need for a more printer friendly version of the state and county list of hydric soil formatted to fit on letter size paper.
Action Item: Hipple to
try to determine if paper size reports can be made.
- Difficult to find county hydric soil lists on various state web sites.
Need a shortcut list of pointers to each state county hydric soils listing.
Couldn’t find county hydric soils lists for Arizona or New Mexico. Action
item: Hipple will provide guidance to states as part of the new procedure
for generating a new national list from soil survey area lists.
- Status of creation of regional hydric soil committees. The regional
committees were to review the composition of the hydric soils list and all
additions and deletions. Northeast (combination of New England states committee
and Mid-Atlantic states committee) region is active. All others are not active.
Ralph Tiner, NWI Coordinator, Hadley, Massachusetts
- Solicit a letter from NTCHS
concurring with the 1998 National List of
Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands and urging the NRCS and other
cooperating agencies to approve the 1998 National List and recommend official
released and publication. Moved by Richardson that such a letter be written.
Seconded by Ping. Motion passed.
- Does NTCHS
endorse the regional New England hydric soil field indicators? No.
- Need guidance on the handling of problem soils such as Spodosols, soils
with red parent material, and cryic/frigid soils.
- Suggests the compilation of a national field indicator guide incorporating
the various regional field indicators. No, not needed. The Mid-Atlantic regional indicators
are already a subset of the of the National indicators. We are working
with the New England committee to get their regional indicators as a subset of
the national indicators.
- Need protocols to determine when a hydric soil is effectively drained.
Tools exist, among which are FOTG
Drainage Guide, ellipse equation, and DRAINMOD.
Brian Huberty, NWI Coordinator, Minneapolis, MN
- Suggest obtaining help of Bill Waltman (Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln) to aid
in predicting the wetland water regimes defined in the Cowardin wetland
classification system through the development of a model based on climate and
hydric soil definitions and specific soil parameters such as soil temperature,
depth to water table, growing degree days, etc. Can be done; Reed and Whited
to work together to actuate.
Dave Lindsey and Norm Mangram, NWI, St. Petersburg, FL
- Suggests making the digital soils information easier to find, download and
use with ArcGIS, especially providing data in shapefile format. Possible
software problem.
- Concern over a number of poorly drained soils in south Florida that are
not listed in county hydric soils list that are very obviously wetland and are
being mapped as wetland in the south Florida Everglades mapping update. Work
with Hurt.
Vasilas provided the following report on hydric soils for the Mid-Atlantic
states:
Working on plant list and isolated wetlands. Monitoring TF2, anomalous bright
parent material soils, flood plain soils, and ECF soils. Also instrumented soil
sited for temperature studies. Looking at upland glauconitic that meet an
indicator (F6 and wetland glauconitic soils that meet no indicator. Also
beginning some work on interdunal soils. At the latest joint New
England/Mid-Atlantic committees meeting some field sites had folistic material
thick enough to be considered Folists; however, they were not fragmental and
therefore don’t class as Folists. They class as Entisols. Action Item:
Hipple to discuss with Craig Ditzler (NSSC,
NRCS). Other activities are the
production of a Mid-Atlantic States Hydric Soil Handbook and the coordination of
a Hydrology Workshop. Motion by Reed that the NTCHS send a letter of
commendation to the Mid-Atlantic States Hydric Soil Committee. Seconded by
Whited. Motion passed. Action Item: Hipple to write letter.
Richardson announced that David Zuberer (Texas A&M University) had been
selected to fill the NTCHS committee institutional vacancy.
The committee recessed for the day at 4:00 pm and reconvened at 8:00 am on
Thursday January 30, 2003.
Vepraskas led a discussion concerning the draft Hydric Soil Technical
Standard (HSTS). Much discussion was generated. Richardson moved to accept the
basic technical aspects of the HSTS.
Seconded by Noble. Motion passed. This
motion effectively removed the draft status of the HSTS.
Discussion concerning the HSTS ceased.
Hipple reported that if there were no objections he would put the minutes of
this annual meeting on the Hydric Soils web site. No one objected. Hipple
reported that he had received a request to have Whited liaison between the NTCHS
and the New England Hydric Soil Committee and, since there were no objection,
made this appointment. Hipple requested that members desiring NASIS training let
him know via email. Hipple noted that there is a requirement that the NTCHS meet
annually. The NTCHS agreed that this annual meeting requirement could be
satisfied electronically (email, teleconference), if necessary.
Discussion concerning the HSTS recommenced. Whited moved that the current
NTCHS policy statement concerning
use of the HSTS be deleted and replaced with
the following:
The NTCHS
recommends that the HSTS be used to:
- evaluate the function of wetland restoration, mitigation, creation, and
construction,
- evaluate onsite the current functional hydric status of a soil, and
- modify, validate, eliminate, or adopt hydric soil field indicators for
the region with appropriate supporting regional data.
Seconded by Richardson. Motion passed.
The current pH range covered by the HSTS is pH 4-8. Vepraskas moved that the
pH range be extended to 2-10. Motion failed due to lack of a second. Hurt moved
the pH range be extended to 3-9. Seconded by Vepraskas. Motion passed.
The current HSTS depths from which to measure for installation purposes is
incomplete. Action Item: Hurt is to email membership a suggested
correction.
Hipple received communication from Indiana NRCS concerning chanced in hydric
soil criteria met for wet Histosols. The old method did not allow for the
saturation criteria (2A, 2B1, 2B2, 2B3) to be reported as being met while the
new method does allow for the saturation criteria to be met. The correspondence
questioned which is correct. Hurt reported the new (allowing for saturation
criteria to be met is correct. Action Item: Hipple inform NRCS Indiana
that the new method is correct.
Action Items: Vepraskas is to notify Hipple of possible additional
problems/changes needed to the HSTS. Hipple is to email membership and request
for volunteers to work on the problems/changes.
The 2004 annual meeting of the NTCHS could possibly be in the Reno, Nevada
area. Blake and Huddleston agreed to research feasibility.
Reed moved that the 2003 annual meeting of the NTCHS adjourn. Seconded by
Whited. Motion passes and the 2003 annual meeting of the NTCHS adjourned at
12:05 am, January 30, 2003.
< Back to National Technical Committee for Hydric
Soils
| |
|